Team 5 - Money for All or a Risky Gamble?

Description

Team 5 - The discussion begins with differing perspectives on UBI, with Joycelyn and Mary strongly supporting its potential to reduce poverty and create financial stability, while Ammar raises concerns about economic sustainability and workforce participation. Daniel intervenes mentioning that UBI could drive up housing costs, making affordability worse. Meanwhile, Khushpreet and Avi consider both sides, recognizing the potential benefits for patient care and people with disabilities but also mentioning the long-term effects on service provision and employment. Abigayle tries to maintain a lighthearted atmosphere but finds herself increasingly concerned about UBIs potential effects on the hospitality industry. As the conversation progresses, interruptions and emotional arguments escalate tensions, with some participants feeling unheard or dismissed. Accusations arise, particularly when Khushpreet suggests that Ammar is prioritizing economic concerns over people’s well-being, and when Daniel challenges Joycelyn’s assertion that UBI is a universally beneficial solution.